<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Amber Bridge Fund &#187; Foreign trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.abfund.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=foreign-trade" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.abfund.org</link>
	<description>Amber-Bidge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-EN</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Germany&#8217;s trade with the Baltic countries</title>
		<link>http://en.abfund.org/?p=1069</link>
		<comments>http://en.abfund.org/?p=1069#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amber Bridge. Journal of Regional Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[№2 (5) 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.abfund.org/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maria Vladimirovna Gracheva — Ph.D. in Economics, leading researcher of Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.  The article of Maria Gracheva examines the characteristics of Germany’s trade with the countries that along with the FRG are the members of the Council of the Baltic Sea states. The analysis is [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page" title="Page 21">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="color: #4c4c4c;">Maria Vladimirovna Gracheva </span><span style="color: #4c4c4c;">— Ph.D. in Economics, leading researcher of Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. </span></p>
<div class="page" title="Page 4">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-style: italic; color: #333333;">The article of Maria Gracheva examines the characteristics of Germany’s trade with the countries that along with the FRG are the members of the Council of the Baltic Sea states. The analysis is based on the statistics of German federal statistical office (Statistisches Bundesamt) in the period of 1992-2014. The author considers such indicators as the share of Baltic states in the German foreign trade turnover, the volumes of Germany’s trade with the particular countries, the trade’s breakdown into the commodity groups. The main Germany’s trade partner countries and the key trade growth/downturn drivers among Baltic countries are identified. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of the commodity structure of the Germany’s trade with the particular countries, including their comparison with the relevant indicators of the total German foreign trade. The main commodities of the Germany’s export/import to/from Baltic countries by the three-digit classification are analysed as well as the roles of the particular countries as the German buyers and suppliers. Some important facts of the period of 2008-2014 are registered, such as the decline of the oil/gas import from Norway and Russia and the growth of the oil products’ import from Russia. The data of German- Baltic trade’s reduction in the first quarter of 2015 are presented and explained chiefly by the negative dynamics of the Russian import due to the termination of the compensation by means of the oil products. The author comes to the conclusion, that in two-three years already Russia can come down to the Germany’s second-class trade partners, and within the Baltic region the main beneficiaries thereon will be Poland, Sweden and Norway. </span></p>
<p>The Baltic States are important trade partners of Germany: in 2014 their share in the foreign trade turnover of Germany amounted to 13.3%, including 12.2% in exports from Germany and 14.6% in imports into the Federal Republic of Germany (the rest of European countries accounted for 56.0% of the German turnover, including 55.8% of exports and 56.4% of imports)[1].</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pic. 1. Role of the Baltic States in the foreign trade of Germany</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>(Share of import from the Baltic States in the cumulative import to Germany</p>
<p>Share of export to the Baltic States in the cumulative export from Germany)</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>In 1992-2008 indicators of the Baltic countries showed a relatively constant growth: from 8.8 to 14.2% of turnover, including a growth from 8.1 to 13.4% of exports from Germany and a growth from 9.6 to 15.0% of imports into Germany (see. Fig. 1), while the share of the rest of European countries declined (turnover &#8211; from 66.1 to 58.5%, exports from Germany &#8211; from 68.9 to 61.1%, and imports into Germany &#8211; from 63.1 to 55.4%). Since 2009, there has been a downward trend in the role of both the Baltic States and other European countries in the foreign trade of Germany (the importance of the countries of Asia &#8211; primarily China, by contrast, has increased). Information on the volumes of German trade with individual countries of the Baltic region is presented in Tables 1 and 2.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table 1. Trade between Germany and the Baltic States in 1992-2014.</strong></p>
<table style="height: 635px;" width="673">
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" width="86"><strong>Country</strong><strong>/<br />
</strong><strong>group of countries</strong></td>
<td colspan="11" width="424"><strong>1992-2014</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="119"><strong>Turnover, Germany</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="113"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="121"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="71"><strong>Balance for Germany </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>position </strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>position </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="44"><strong>position </strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="43">919,9</td>
<td width="36">3,07</td>
<td width="40">1</td>
<td width="39">518,2</td>
<td width="36">3,18</td>
<td width="39">1</td>
<td width="40">401,7</td>
<td width="36">2,95</td>
<td width="44">2</td>
<td width="35">116,5</td>
<td rowspan="10" width="36"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Russia </strong></td>
<td width="43">855,2</td>
<td width="36">2,86</td>
<td width="40">2</td>
<td width="39">387,8</td>
<td width="36">2,38</td>
<td width="39">2</td>
<td width="40">467,4</td>
<td width="36">3,43</td>
<td width="44">1</td>
<td width="35">-79,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Sweden </strong></td>
<td width="43">580,3</td>
<td width="36">1,94</td>
<td width="40">3</td>
<td width="39">342,2</td>
<td width="36">2,10</td>
<td width="39">3</td>
<td width="40">238,1</td>
<td width="36">1,75</td>
<td width="44">4</td>
<td width="35">104,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Denmark </strong></td>
<td width="43">472,7</td>
<td width="36">1,58</td>
<td width="40">4</td>
<td width="39">260,7</td>
<td width="36">1,60</td>
<td width="39">4</td>
<td width="40">212,0</td>
<td width="36">1,56</td>
<td width="44">5</td>
<td width="35">48,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Norway </strong></td>
<td width="43">431,0</td>
<td width="36">1,44</td>
<td width="40">5</td>
<td width="39">125,1</td>
<td width="36">0,77</td>
<td width="39">6</td>
<td width="40">305,9</td>
<td width="36">2,25</td>
<td width="44">3</td>
<td width="35">-180,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Finland </strong></td>
<td width="43">280,7</td>
<td width="36">0,94</td>
<td width="40">6</td>
<td width="39">150,1</td>
<td width="36">0,92</td>
<td width="39">5</td>
<td width="40">130,6</td>
<td width="36">0,96</td>
<td width="44">6</td>
<td width="35">19,5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="43">51,9</td>
<td width="36">0,17</td>
<td width="40">7</td>
<td width="39">32,3</td>
<td width="36">0,20</td>
<td width="39">7</td>
<td width="40">19,6</td>
<td width="36">0,14</td>
<td width="44">7</td>
<td width="35">12,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="43">29,2</td>
<td width="36">0,10</td>
<td width="40">8</td>
<td width="39">19,6</td>
<td width="36">0,12</td>
<td width="39">8</td>
<td width="40">9,6</td>
<td width="36">0,07</td>
<td width="44">8</td>
<td width="35">10,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Estonia </strong></td>
<td width="43">26,2</td>
<td width="36">0,09</td>
<td width="40">9</td>
<td width="39">18,8</td>
<td width="36">0,12</td>
<td width="39">9</td>
<td width="40">7,4</td>
<td width="36">0,05</td>
<td width="44">10</td>
<td width="35">11,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Iceland</strong></td>
<td width="43">16,0</td>
<td width="36">0,05</td>
<td width="40">10</td>
<td width="39">6,7</td>
<td width="36">0,04</td>
<td width="39">10</td>
<td width="40">9,3</td>
<td width="36">0,07</td>
<td width="44">9</td>
<td width="35">-2,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Total Baltic States </strong></td>
<td width="43">3.663,1</td>
<td width="36">12,24</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="39">1.861,4</td>
<td width="36">11,41</td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="40">1.801,7</td>
<td width="36">13,23</td>
<td width="44"></td>
<td width="35">59,7</td>
<td width="36">2,22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="43"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="44"></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="86"><strong>Whole world </strong></td>
<td width="43">29.926,6</td>
<td width="36">100,00</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="39">16.307,5</td>
<td width="36">100,00</td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="40">13.619,1</td>
<td width="36">100,00</td>
<td width="44"></td>
<td width="35">2.688,4</td>
<td width="36">100,00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: The Baltic States are presented in descending order of their turnover with Germany in 1992-2014.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong> 2. </strong><strong>Main partner countries of Germany in its trade with the Baltic States in 1992 and in 2014. </strong></p>
<table width="510">
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="56"><strong>Indicator </strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Country </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="58"><strong>1992</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="55"><strong>Indicator </strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Country </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="60"><strong>2014</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="28"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="30"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="31"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6" width="56"><strong>Turnover </strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>Germany – Baltic States </strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="28">14,7</td>
<td width="30">24,9</td>
<td rowspan="6" width="55"><strong>Turnover </strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>Germany – Baltic States</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="31">87,5</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">32,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">14,0</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="30">23,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="31">67,7</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">24,8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="28">8,4</td>
<td width="30">14,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>3 main countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="28">37,1</td>
<td width="30">62,9</td>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total </strong></td>
<td width="31">155,0</td>
<td width="28">56,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, total</strong></td>
<td width="28">59,0</td>
<td width="30">100,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">272,8</td>
<td width="28">100,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="56"><strong>Export<br />
from Germany to the Baltic States </strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="28">7,5</td>
<td width="30">26,9</td>
<td rowspan="4" width="55"><strong>Export<br />
from Germany to the Baltic States</strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="31">47,7</td>
<td width="28">34,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td width="28">6,6</td>
<td width="30">23,8</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="31">29,3</td>
<td width="28">21,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">14,1</td>
<td width="30">50,8</td>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">77,1</td>
<td width="28">55,5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Export from Germany to the Baltic States, total</strong></td>
<td width="28">27,8</td>
<td width="30">100,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Export from Germany to the Baltic States, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">138,9</td>
<td width="28">100,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6" width="56"><strong>Import<br />
from the Baltic States to Germany </strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Denmark </strong></td>
<td width="28">7,3</td>
<td width="30">23,5</td>
<td rowspan="6" width="55"><strong>Import<br />
from the Baltic States to Germany</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="31">39,8</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">29,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">7,2</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="30">23,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="31">38,4</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">28,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="28">4,7</td>
<td width="30">14,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>3 main countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="28">19,2</td>
<td width="30">61,6</td>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total </strong></td>
<td width="31">78,2</td>
<td width="28">58,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Import from the Baltic States to Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">31,2</td>
<td width="30">100,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Import from the Baltic States to Germany, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">133,8</td>
<td width="28">100,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="56"><strong>Balance for Germany – cumulative surplus </strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">0,3</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="30">90,0</td>
<td rowspan="4" width="55"><strong>Balance for Germany – cumulative surplus</strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="31">8,0</td>
<td width="28">32,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="31">7,4</td>
<td width="28">29,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>1 main country, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">0,3</td>
<td width="30">90,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">15,4</td>
<td width="28">61,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Cumulative surplus for Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">0,3</td>
<td width="30">100,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Cumulative surplus for Germany, total</strong></td>
<td width="31">25,0</td>
<td width="28">100,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="56"><strong>Balance for Germany – combined deficit </strong></td>
<td width="141"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="28">-1,8</td>
<td width="30">47,6</td>
<td rowspan="4" width="55"><strong>Balance for Germany – combined deficit</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="141"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="31">-10,7</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="28">53,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td width="28">-0,7</td>
<td width="30">19,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>2 main countries, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">-2,5</td>
<td width="30">66,8</td>
<td width="141"><strong>One main country, total </strong></td>
<td width="31">-10,7</td>
<td width="28">53,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141"><strong>Combined deficit for Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="28">-3,7</td>
<td width="30">100,0</td>
<td width="141"><strong>Combined deficit for Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="31">-20,0</td>
<td width="28">100,0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note. The main partners are listed as countries in descending order with the largest volume of trade, export, import and balance, which together accounted for more than 50% of the respective indicators in 1992 and 2014.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Within the whole period of 1992-2014, Germany&#8217;s main partners among the ten Baltic States were the following four countries &#8211; <strong>Poland, Russia, Sweden and Norway</strong>, including:</p>
<p>- Poland, Russia, Sweden &#8211; in turnover and exports from Germany,</p>
<p>- Russia, Poland, Norway &#8211; in imports to Germany,</p>
<p>- Poland and Sweden &#8211; in surplus for Germany,</p>
<p>- Norway – in deficit for Germany.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For more than twenty years there have occurred major shifts: in 1992, the most important contractors were Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Poland; now Denmark is not among them, and Sweden and Norway have been overshadowed by Poland and Russia.</p>
<p>In 1992-2014 Germany formed a surplus in trade with the Baltic countries totaling 60 billion euros, but its share in the German foreign trade surplus as a whole (2.7 trillion euros) was only 2.2% &#8211; much lower than the corresponding figures of turnover (12.2 %), exports from Germany (11.4%) and imports to Germany (13.2%). This situation is due to the sustained deficit in German trade with Norway and Russia (these countries are on the second and third places after the Netherlands in terms of the German trade deficit). In 1992-2003 the German-Baltic trade balance was variable with a predominance of the negative balance for Germany. Since 2004 it has become steadily positive for Germany (mainly due to a rapid increase of surplus in the trade with Poland).</p>
<p>Key countries to determine the dynamics of the German trade with the Baltic States are shown in Tables 4 and 5. The most powerful driving forces in general over the last 22 years were Poland and Russia (they were the main factors of growth both in exports from Germany, as well as in imports into Germany, and in 1992-2014 provided respectively 37 and 28% of growth of the German-Baltic turnover). Sweden and Norway took the second place (with growth of 10% and 9%).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table 4. Key forces – countries of the German – Baltic trade in 1992-2014, 1992-2000 and in 2000-2008.</strong></p>
<table width="510">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="64"><strong>Country/group of countries </strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="140"><strong>Total change </strong><strong>2014/1992</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="150"><strong>Change </strong><strong>2000/1992</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="156"><strong>Change </strong><strong>2008/2000</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="66"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="77"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="78"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="79"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>Growth</strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="42"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Growth</strong></td>
<td width="44"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="45"><strong>Growth share</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Bln euro </strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="42"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="44"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td width="45"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="27">+43,5</td>
<td width="39">+39,2</td>
<td width="35">+35,5</td>
<td width="39">+34,6</td>
<td width="34">+10,3</td>
<td width="40">+34,3</td>
<td width="34">+7,7</td>
<td width="42">+23,5</td>
<td width="33">+26,2</td>
<td width="44">+35,3</td>
<td width="33">+13,9</td>
<td width="45">+24,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="27">+26,1</td>
<td width="39">+23,5</td>
<td width="35">+34,5</td>
<td width="39">+33,6</td>
<td width="34"></td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="34">+10,8</td>
<td width="42">+33,1</td>
<td width="33">+25,7</td>
<td width="44">+34,5</td>
<td width="33">+22,4</td>
<td width="45">+39,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="27"></td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="34">+6,0</td>
<td width="40">+20,1</td>
<td width="34"></td>
<td width="42"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="44"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="45"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="64"><strong>Growth in the Baltic countries </strong></td>
<td width="27">+111,1</td>
<td width="39">+100,0</td>
<td width="35">+102,7</td>
<td width="39">+100,0</td>
<td width="34">+30,1</td>
<td width="40">+100,0</td>
<td width="34">+32,7</td>
<td width="42">+100,0</td>
<td width="33">+74,3</td>
<td width="44">+100,0</td>
<td width="33">+57,3</td>
<td width="45">100,0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table 5. Key forces – countries of the German – Baltic trade in 2008-2014 and 2012-2014.</strong></p>
<table width="510">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="43"><strong>Country/group of countries </strong></td>
<td colspan="8" width="241"><strong>Change </strong><strong>2014/2008</strong></td>
<td colspan="8" width="227"><strong>Change </strong><strong>2014/2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" width="127"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="114"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="114"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="114"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35"><strong>Growth</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Decline</strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Decline share </strong></td>
<td width="29"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Decline </strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Decline share </strong></td>
<td width="23"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Decline </strong></td>
<td width="29"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Decline share </strong></td>
<td width="23"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="27"><strong>Decline </strong></td>
<td width="30"><strong>Growth share </strong></td>
<td width="34"><strong>Decline share </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="71"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="56"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="57"><strong>Bln euro </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="56"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="50"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="64"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="50"><strong>Bln euro</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="64"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="35">+7,0</td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="28">+65,4</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29">+13,9</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">+85,2</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="23">+5,9</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29">+62,1</td>
<td width="34"></td>
<td width="23">+6,7</td>
<td width="27"></td>
<td width="30">+77,7</td>
<td width="34"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="35">-3,0</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">-76,4</td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="28">-8,8</td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="34">-99,5</td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="27"></td>
<td width="30"></td>
<td width="34"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="28">-3,1</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">-82,0</td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="34"></td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="27">-7,0</td>
<td width="30"></td>
<td width="34">-59,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Growth in the Baltic States </strong></td>
<td width="35">+10,7</td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="28">+100,0</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29">+16,3</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">+100,0</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="23">+9,5</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="29">+100,0</td>
<td width="34"></td>
<td width="23">+8,7</td>
<td width="27"></td>
<td width="30">+100,0</td>
<td width="34"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Decline in the Baltic States </strong></td>
<td width="35"></td>
<td width="35">-3,9</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">-100,0</td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="28">-3,8</td>
<td width="28"></td>
<td width="28">-100,0</td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="28">-8,8</td>
<td width="29"></td>
<td width="34">-100,0</td>
<td width="23"></td>
<td width="27">-11,8</td>
<td width="30"></td>
<td width="34">-100,0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note. The main factors are countries listed in descending order with the largest increase/reduction of export/import, which total share in the growth/decline of the corresponding indicators was more than 50%.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In certain periods the following countries were the main trade partners:</p>
<p>- In 1992-2000: for exports from Germany &#8211; Poland and Sweden (growth factors), for imports into Germany &#8211; Russia and Poland (growth factors);</p>
<p>- In 2000-2008: for exports from Germany &#8211; Poland and Russia (growth factors), for imports into Germany &#8211; Russia and Poland (growth factors);</p>
<p>- In 2008-2014 years in general and in 2012-2014 in particular: for exports from Germany &#8211; Poland (growth factor) and Russia (recession factor), for imports into Germany &#8211; Poland (growth factor), and Norway (recession factor).</p>
<p>Poland would return as a source of positive pulses after each case of decrease of the indicators of its trade with Germany in 1992-2014. Russia, too, managed to do this for 20 years, but in the last two years it has dramatically changed its role, becoming the brake of the German-Baltic trade instead of its accelerator. The share of Poland in the foreign trade turnover of Germany rose from 1.3% in 1992 to 4.3% in 2014, the corresponding indicator for Russia rose from 1.1 to 3.3% (maximum &#8211; 4.0% &#8211; was achieved in 2012).</p>
<p>As for the remaining six of the Baltic countries, among them are two larger counterparts of Germany &#8211; Denmark and Finland, and four smaller &#8211; three post-Soviet states (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia) and Iceland. Both in 1992-2000 and in 2000-2008, all six countries were factors of growth for the trade between Germany and the Baltic States (being inferior to a group of four countries mentioned above). But in 2008-2014 only the new European trio played a positive role, while the “old Europeans” generated negative pulses (Finland and Iceland &#8211; in both directions of trade, Denmark &#8211; for imports to Germany). As a result, the total share of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia in the foreign trade turnover of Germany rose from 0.1% in 1992 to 0.4% in 2014, thus indicating that the growth rate of Germany&#8217;s trade with these countries turned out to be the highest within the Baltic region.</p>
<p>Distribution of the indicators of the German trade with the Baltic countries and the whole world for four product groups, that are classified in accordance with the increase in the degree of processing of the goods (and, consequently, increase of the share of value added in the value of goods), is presented in Tables 6 and 7.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong> 6. </strong><strong>Structure of the goods of the German – Baltic trade in 2014, % of turnover between Germany and the Baltic States </strong></p>
<table width="510">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="99"><strong>Indicator/goods group (code, name) </strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="28"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="31"><strong>Denmark </strong></td>
<td width="46"><strong>Finland</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Lithuania</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Iceland</strong></td>
<td width="49"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, total </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="42"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td width="14"><strong>1-4</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Food</strong></td>
<td width="35">1,5</td>
<td width="28">0,4</td>
<td width="35">0,5</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="31">1,0</td>
<td width="46">0,3</td>
<td width="43">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">4,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Raw materials</strong></td>
<td width="35">0,2</td>
<td width="28">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="36">0,0</td>
<td width="31">0,3</td>
<td width="46">0,0</td>
<td width="43">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">0,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Semi-processed goods</strong></td>
<td width="35">1,6</td>
<td width="28">0,2</td>
<td width="35">0,3</td>
<td width="36">0,1</td>
<td width="31">0,3</td>
<td width="46">0,2</td>
<td width="43">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">2,8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>7-8</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Finished products</strong></td>
<td width="35">14,1</td>
<td width="28">10,4</td>
<td width="35">7,0</td>
<td width="36">2,9</td>
<td width="31">4,5</td>
<td width="46">2,8</td>
<td width="43">0,8</td>
<td width="35">0,5</td>
<td width="35">0,5</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="49">43,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" width="42"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td width="14"><strong>1-4</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Food</strong></td>
<td width="35">1,7</td>
<td width="28">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="31">1,2</td>
<td width="46">0,0</td>
<td width="43">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">3,5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Raw materials</strong></td>
<td width="35">0,3</td>
<td width="28">10,2</td>
<td width="35">0,3</td>
<td width="36">6,1</td>
<td width="31">0,3</td>
<td width="46">0,0</td>
<td width="43">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">17,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Semi-processed goods</strong></td>
<td width="35">1,2</td>
<td width="28">3,7</td>
<td width="35">0,8</td>
<td width="36">0,6</td>
<td width="31">0,2</td>
<td width="46">0,6</td>
<td width="43">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="49">7,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="14"><strong>7-8</strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Finished products</strong></td>
<td width="35">10,8</td>
<td width="28">0,7</td>
<td width="35">3,8</td>
<td width="36">0,4</td>
<td width="31">2,3</td>
<td width="46">2,0</td>
<td width="43">0,3</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,1</td>
<td width="35">0,0</td>
<td width="49">20,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="99"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, total*</strong></td>
<td width="35">31,4</td>
<td width="28">25,7</td>
<td width="35">12,9</td>
<td width="36">10,5</td>
<td width="31">10,2</td>
<td width="46">5,9</td>
<td width="43">1,5</td>
<td width="35">0,8</td>
<td width="35">0,8</td>
<td width="35">0,3</td>
<td width="49">100,0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* excluding returned, replaced and not allocated by commodity groups goods.</p>
<p>Note. The Baltic countries are presented in descending order of their turnover with Germany in 2014.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong>  7. </strong><strong>Structure of the goods of the German &#8211; Baltic trade and the overall German foreign trade in 2014, % of export/import/turnover of certain countries, Baltic States and the whole world. </strong></p>
<table width="510">
<thead>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" width="88"><strong>Indicator/goods group (code, name)</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="31"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="37"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="43"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="31"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="39"><strong>Finland</strong></td>
<td width="31"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="41"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>Iceland</strong></td>
<td width="35"><strong>Baltic States, total </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="26"><strong>Whole world</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" width="14"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td width="21"><strong>1-4</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Food</strong></td>
<td width="36">8,4</td>
<td width="31">4,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="37">6,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">7,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">16,4</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">8,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="32">11,6</td>
<td width="41">7,7</td>
<td width="36">10,2</td>
<td width="36">12,1</td>
<td width="35">8,2</td>
<td colspan="2" width="26">6,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Raw materials </strong></td>
<td width="36">1,2</td>
<td width="31">0,3</td>
<td colspan="2" width="37">0,9</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">0,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">4,4</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">0,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="32">0,4</td>
<td width="41">0,5</td>
<td width="36">0,9</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="35">1,2</td>
<td colspan="2" width="26">1,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Semi-processed goods </strong></td>
<td width="36">9,0</td>
<td width="31">1,7</td>
<td colspan="2" width="37">4,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">3,2</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">5,1</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">6,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="32">3,5</td>
<td width="41">10,1</td>
<td width="36">4,3</td>
<td width="36">2,3</td>
<td width="35">5,5</td>
<td colspan="2" width="26">5,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>7-8</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Finished products </strong></td>
<td width="36">81,4</td>
<td width="31">94,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="37">88,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">89,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">74,1</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">85,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="32">84,5</td>
<td width="41">81,7</td>
<td width="36">84,6</td>
<td width="36">85,4</td>
<td width="35">85,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="26">86,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Export from Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="31">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="31">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="32">100,0</td>
<td width="41">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="35">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="26">100,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" width="14"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td width="21"><strong>1-4</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Food</strong></td>
<td width="36">11,9</td>
<td width="31">0,6</td>
<td width="36">2,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">2,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">28,6</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">1,1</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">21,2</td>
<td width="41">6,0</td>
<td width="36">14,8</td>
<td width="36">17,2</td>
<td width="35">7,1</td>
<td width="26">8,5</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Raw materials </strong></td>
<td width="36">2,4</td>
<td width="31">69,6</td>
<td width="36">5,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">83,6</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">7,7</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">0,6</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">2,5</td>
<td width="41">9,8</td>
<td width="36">9,1</td>
<td width="36">2,7</td>
<td width="35">35,6</td>
<td width="26">11,6</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Semi-processed goods </strong></td>
<td width="36">8,7</td>
<td width="31">25,2</td>
<td width="36">16,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">7,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">5,9</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">21,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">16,1</td>
<td width="41">14,0</td>
<td width="36">11,0</td>
<td width="36">68,4</td>
<td width="35">15,1</td>
<td width="26">8,7</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>7-8</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Finished products </strong></td>
<td width="36">77,0</td>
<td width="31">4,6</td>
<td width="36">75,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">5,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">57,8</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">77,3</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">60,2</td>
<td width="41">70,2</td>
<td width="36">65,1</td>
<td width="36">11,7</td>
<td width="35">42,2</td>
<td width="26">71,2</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Import to Germany, total </strong></td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="31">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">100,0</td>
<td width="41">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="35">100,0</td>
<td width="26">100,0</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" width="14"><strong>Turnover of Germany </strong></td>
<td width="21"><strong>1-4</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Food </strong></td>
<td width="36">10,0</td>
<td width="31">2,0</td>
<td width="36">5,3</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">4,2</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">21,2</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">5,1</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">15,1</td>
<td width="41">7,4</td>
<td width="36">11,5</td>
<td width="36">15,2</td>
<td width="35">7,6</td>
<td width="26">7,1</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Raw materials </strong></td>
<td width="36">1,7</td>
<td width="31">39,7</td>
<td width="36">2,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">58,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">5,7</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">0,5</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">1,1</td>
<td width="41">2,5</td>
<td width="36">3,2</td>
<td width="36">1,7</td>
<td width="35">18,0</td>
<td width="26">6,0</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Semi-processed goods </strong></td>
<td width="36">8,9</td>
<td width="31">15,1</td>
<td width="36">8,8</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">6,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">5,4</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">12,8</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">8,1</td>
<td width="41">11,0</td>
<td width="36">6,2</td>
<td width="36">42,4</td>
<td width="35">10,2</td>
<td width="26">7,0</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="21"><strong>7-8</strong></td>
<td width="53"><strong>Finished products </strong></td>
<td width="36">79,4</td>
<td width="31">43,2</td>
<td width="36">83,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">31,3</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">67,6</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">81,6</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">75,6</td>
<td width="41">79,1</td>
<td width="36">79,1</td>
<td width="36">40,8</td>
<td width="35">64,2</td>
<td width="26">79,9</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, total*</strong></td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="31">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="43">100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="31">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="39">100,0</td>
<td colspan="3" width="32">100,0</td>
<td width="41">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="36">100,0</td>
<td width="35">100,0</td>
<td width="26">100,0</td>
<td width="0"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* excluding returned, replaced and not allocated by commodity groups goods.</p>
<p>Note. The Baltic countries are presented in descending order of their turnover with Germany in 2014.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The main part of the German-Baltic trade (52.6% of the turnover) is in:</p>
<p>- German exports of finished products into Poland (14.1%), Russia (10.4%) and Sweden (7.0%),</p>
<p>- Import of finished products from Poland (10.8%) and raw materials from Russia (10.2%).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A substantial component is also import of raw materials from Norway (6.1%). In other cases, the share of product groups by country does not exceed 5%. Germany has a positive balance in the German-Baltic trade of food and finished products, and a negative balance – in the trade in raw materials and semi-processed goods. The total surplus for Germany consists mainly of excess surplus in finished products (Poland and Sweden) over the deficit of raw material (Norway and Russia).</p>
<p>The structure of German exports to the Baltic States and the overall German exports are very similar: the maximum difference (the share of food) is only slightly more than two percentage points. German imports from the Baltic States, by contrast, strongly deviates from the overall German import: on the one hand, by the shares of raw materials and semi-finished goods (the German import from the Baltic States has, respectively, 24 and 6 percentage points more than the overall German import); on the other hand, by the share of finished products (the German import from the Baltic States has 29 percentage points less than the overall German import). As a result, the basis of turnover of Germany with the world and with the Baltic States is the same &#8211; products with a higher degree of processing, namely finished products (64 and 80%, respectively), but the value of the goods with a low and medium degree of processing &#8211; raw materials and semi-finished products &#8211; in the German – Baltic trade is much larger (28%) than in the foreign trade of Germany as a whole (13%).</p>
<p>The structure of German exports in each of the Baltic countries is characterized by a common main feature &#8211; a strong dominance of finished products (ranging from 74.1% in Denmark to 94.0% in Russia; average Baltic and average world indicators are, respectively, 85.1 and 86.9%). At the same time, six countries have an additional focus: on food &#8211; Denmark (16.4%), Iceland (12.1%), Lithuania (11.6%), Latvia (10.2%) with the average Baltic and average world level of, respectively, 8.2 and 6.0%; semi-processed goods &#8211; Estonia (10.1%) and Poland (9.0%) with the average Baltic and average world level of, respectively, 5.5 and 5.6%. In four countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia) there are no such focuses.</p>
<p>As sources of the German import certain Baltic countries show considerable specificity. The most striking peculiarity is that of these three importers with an extremely low share of finished products (Russia &#8211; 4.6%, Norway &#8211; 5.8%, Iceland &#8211; 11.7%). For the rest of the Baltic countries this figure ranges from 57.8 to 77.3%, the average Baltic value is 42.2%, the world average is 71.2%. The above mentioned three countries are specialized in: Norway and Russia &#8211; raw materials (83.6 and 69.6%, respectively), Iceland – semi-processed goods (68.4%). Russia has an additional emphasis on semi-processed products (25.2%), Norway and Iceland do not have it. Since the absolute volume of imports of semi-processed products from Iceland is very small, the above-noted important role of the Baltic States for Germany as a source of raw materials and semi-processed products is concentrated in only two of the ten countries &#8211; Russia (raw materials and semi-processed products) and Norway (raw materials).</p>
<p>Among the other seven importers, who are leaders in finished products, two groups with additional focuses can be distinguished:</p>
<p>• focus on food &#8211; Denmark (28.6%), Lithuania (21.2%), Latvia (14.8%), Poland (11.9%) with the world average of 8.5%;</p>
<p>• on semi-processed products &#8211; Finland (21.0%), Lithuania (16.1%), Sweden (16.0%), Estonia (14.0%) with the world average of 8.7%.</p>
<p>The concretization of these features in the context of three-digit product classification is presented in Tables 8 and 9.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table 8. Main goods of the German export in the Baltic States in 2014.</strong></p>
<table width="513">
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="43"><strong>Country</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="323"><strong>Main goods of export from Germany to a country </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="147"><strong>Main goods of the additional export focus of the country </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="133"><strong>Goods (code, name) </strong></td>
<td width="45"><strong>Share in the export from Germany to a country, %</strong></td>
<td width="73"><strong>Share of a country in the overall German export of these goods, %</strong></td>
<td width="73"><strong>Position of the country in the overall German export of the goods </strong></td>
<td width="101"><strong>Goods position (code, name) </strong></td>
<td width="46"><strong>Share in the export of Germany to a country, %</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="133">885. Passenger cars</td>
<td width="45">19,2</td>
<td width="73">1,3</td>
<td width="73">18</td>
<td colspan="2" width="147"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="133">885. Passenger cars</td>
<td width="45">12,4</td>
<td width="73">0,1</td>
<td width="73">48</td>
<td width="101">423. Strong alcohol beverages</td>
<td width="46">1,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="133">885. Passenger cars</td>
<td width="45">11,6</td>
<td width="73">2,0</td>
<td width="73">14</td>
<td colspan="2" width="147"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Iceland</strong></td>
<td width="133">885. Passenger cars</td>
<td width="45">9,9</td>
<td width="73">0,0</td>
<td width="73">78</td>
<td width="101">206. Fish, shellfish, mussels</td>
<td width="46">2,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="133">861. Equipment for production and distribution of electricity</td>
<td width="45">9,2</td>
<td width="73">0,3</td>
<td width="73">44</td>
<td width="101">669. Oil products</td>
<td width="46">4,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Finland</strong></td>
<td width="133">885. Passenger cars</td>
<td width="45">8,4</td>
<td width="73">0,6</td>
<td width="73">27</td>
<td colspan="2" width="147"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="133">884. Automobile components</td>
<td width="45">8,3</td>
<td width="73">3,3</td>
<td width="73">10</td>
<td colspan="2" width="147"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="133">884. Automobile components</td>
<td width="45">8,2</td>
<td width="73">5,1</td>
<td width="73">6</td>
<td width="101">669. Oil products</td>
<td width="46">3,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td width="133">861. Machinery for production and distribution of energy</td>
<td width="45">5,3</td>
<td width="73">1,7</td>
<td width="73">18</td>
<td width="101">204. Meat and meat products</td>
<td width="46">3,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="43"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="133">834. Pharmaceutical products</td>
<td width="45">5,0</td>
<td width="73">0,2</td>
<td width="73">49</td>
<td width="101">395. Other foods of plant origin</td>
<td width="46">1,6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: The Baltic countries are presented in descending order of the proportion of the main export commodity in the exports from Germany in 2014.</p>
<p><strong>Table 9. Main goods of the German import from the Baltic States in 2014.</strong></p>
<table width="514">
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="46"><strong>Country</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="320"><strong>Main goods of the import into Germany from a country </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="148"><strong>Main goods of the additional import focus </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="132"><strong>Goods (code, name) </strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Share in the import into Germany from a country, %</strong></td>
<td width="74"><strong>Share of a country in the overall German import of these goods, %</strong></td>
<td width="72"><strong>Position of a country in the overall German imports of the goods </strong></td>
<td width="106"><strong>Position of the goods (code, name) </strong></td>
<td width="43"><strong>Share in the import into Germany from a country, %</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="132">518. Oil and natural gas</td>
<td width="43">82,0</td>
<td width="74">18,9</td>
<td width="72">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="132">518. Oil and natural gas</td>
<td width="43">66,6</td>
<td width="74">30,8</td>
<td width="72">1</td>
<td width="106">669. Oil products</td>
<td width="43">16,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Iceland</strong></td>
<td width="132">645. Aluminum and aluminum alloys, including waste and scrap</td>
<td width="43">64,3</td>
<td width="74">5,6</td>
<td width="72">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Finland</strong></td>
<td width="132">708. Paperandcardboard</td>
<td width="43">20,4</td>
<td width="74">19,0</td>
<td width="72">2</td>
<td width="106">608. Semi-finished products of cellulose fiber</td>
<td width="43">5,5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="132">884. Automobile components</td>
<td width="43">13,2</td>
<td width="74">10,6</td>
<td width="72">3</td>
<td width="106">
<ol start="6">
<li>Fish, shell fish, mussels</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="43">2,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="132">708. Paper and cardboard</td>
<td width="43">12,1</td>
<td width="74">21,3</td>
<td width="72">1</td>
<td width="106">608. Semi-finished products of cellulose fiber</td>
<td width="43">4,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="132">815. Items made of wood (apart from furniture)</td>
<td width="43">11,6</td>
<td width="74">2,2</td>
<td width="72">10</td>
<td width="106">607. Lumber</td>
<td width="43">5,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="132">875. Furniture</td>
<td width="43">10,0</td>
<td width="74">1,3</td>
<td width="72">18</td>
<td width="106">206. Fish, shell fish, mussels</td>
<td width="43">7,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Latvia </strong></td>
<td width="132">709. Plywood and plywood sheets, chipboards</td>
<td width="43">8,2</td>
<td width="74">2,6</td>
<td width="72">11</td>
<td width="106">383. Oil cake</td>
<td width="43">5,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td width="132">834. Pharmaceutical products</td>
<td width="43">6,9</td>
<td width="74">2,1</td>
<td width="72">11</td>
<td width="106">204. Meat and meat products</td>
<td width="43">6,7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note. The Baltic countries are presented in descending order of the share of the main imported goods in the imports of Germany in 2014.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Passenger cars belonging to the product group &#8220;finished products&#8221; are the main commodity items of the overall German exports (0.9%), German exports to the Baltic States (6.9%) and German exports into five Baltic countries (Norway, Latvia, Sweden, Iceland , Finland). “Automotive components”, which are close to the group of passenger cars, are the leader in exports from Germany to Russia and Poland. Only in three cases, the leading role is played by other products, also belonging to the group of “finished products”- equipment for the production and distribution of electricity (Estonia and Denmark) and pharmaceutical products (Lithuania). Five countries (Poland, Russia, Sweden, Norway, Denmark) are in the top twenty of the German consumers for the corresponding main goods, with the highest position &#8211; the sixth in export of automobile components from Germany –is held by Poland. Two countries (Estonia and Poland) have the same additional export emphasis on semi-finished products (oil products), and there is no unity for countries with a focus on food.</p>
<p>Oil and natural gas belonging to the commodity group &#8220;raw material&#8221; are the main position of the overall German imports (9.5%), German imports from the Baltic States (32.9%) and German imports from Norway and Russia. Imports from Iceland to Germany are focused on aluminum (group &#8220;semi-finished products&#8221;). Specialization on the group &#8220;finished products&#8221; is characteristic of German imports from the other seven Baltic countries, including: specialization on products related to the processing of wood &#8211; from Finland, Sweden (paper and cardboard), Estonia (wood products except furniture), Lithuania (furniture), Latvia (plywood); on automotive components &#8211; from Poland, for pharmaceutical products – from Denmark. All Baltic countries are in the top twenty of the German suppliers of the relevant main products, with the highest &#8211; the first – positions held by Russia (oil/gas) and Sweden (paper/cardboard). Semi-finished products as an additional import emphasis are closely related to the main item: in Russia &#8211; oil products (to oil/gas), in Finland and Sweden &#8211; semi-finished products made of cellulose (paper/cardboard), Estonia – lumber (with woodwork).</p>
<p>Norway offers the highest shares in the main goods both in the export from Germany, and in the imports to Germany, but if for passenger cars, the figure is 19.2% of German exports, for oil/gas it is extremely high &#8211; 82.0% of German imports. Concentration of German imports on a single goods group is also characteristic of Russia (oil/gas &#8211; 66.6%) and Iceland (aluminum/aluminum alloys &#8211; 64.3%), while in other countries the figure is in the range of 6, 9 to 20.4%. In fact, German import from Norway, Russia and Iceland is monocultural, and monocultural are items of low-grade processing. Before the crisis, which began in autumn 2008, this one-sidedness did not prevent active growth of imports from these countries, but in 2008-2014 the cumulative decline in German imports from the Baltic States in the context of the four commodity groups appeared to be by about 3/5 due to the reduction of imports of oil/gas from Norway and Russia: Norway had more than ⅓, and Russia &#8211; about ¼ of this recession. As a result, imports from Norway in 2008-2014 decreased by 13.8%, while imports from Russia increased by 3.5%. However, this happened only because reduction of Russian imports of oil/gas was more than offset by a rise in imports of Russian oil products.</p>
<p>In the first quarter of 2015 this compensation was no longer valid. Trade turnover between Germany and Russia showed the most negative dynamics among the Baltic countries. Changes in the German-Baltic trade in the first quarter of 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 are presented in Tables 10 and 11.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong>  10.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Trade between Germany and Baltic States in 2014-2015.</strong></p>
<table width="519">
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" width="68"><strong>Country/Group of countries </strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="126"><strong>Turnover </strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="132"><strong>Export from Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="121"><strong>Import into Germany </strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="72"><strong>Balance for Germany </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="38"><strong>January – March </strong><strong> 2014</strong></td>
<td width="39"><strong>January – March </strong><strong>2015</strong></td>
<td width="49"><strong>Change, </strong><strong>2015/2014</strong></td>
<td width="42"><strong>January – March, </strong><strong>2014</strong></td>
<td width="38"><strong>January – March, </strong><strong>2015</strong></td>
<td width="52"><strong>Change, </strong><strong>2015/2014</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>January &#8211; March</strong><strong> 2014</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>January – March </strong><strong>2015</strong></td>
<td width="49"><strong>Change, </strong><strong>2015/2014</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>January – March, </strong><strong> 2014</strong></td>
<td width="36"><strong>January – March </strong><strong> 2015</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="77"><strong>Bln euros</strong></td>
<td width="49"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="80"><strong>Bln euros </strong></td>
<td width="52"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="72"><strong>Bln euros </strong></td>
<td width="49"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="72"><strong>Bln euros</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="38">20,9</td>
<td width="39">23,3</td>
<td width="49">111,2</td>
<td width="42">11,4</td>
<td width="38">12,4</td>
<td width="52">109,5</td>
<td width="36">9,6</td>
<td width="36">10,8</td>
<td width="49">113,2</td>
<td width="36">1,8</td>
<td width="36">1,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="38">18,1</td>
<td width="39">12,4</td>
<td width="49">68,4</td>
<td width="42">7,5</td>
<td width="38">5,0</td>
<td width="52">66,1</td>
<td width="36">10,5</td>
<td width="36">7,4</td>
<td width="49">70,1</td>
<td width="36">-3,0</td>
<td width="36">-2,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="38">8,9</td>
<td width="39">9,1</td>
<td width="49">101,8</td>
<td width="42">5,3</td>
<td width="38">5,6</td>
<td width="52">105,4</td>
<td width="36">3,6</td>
<td width="36">3,4</td>
<td width="49">96,5</td>
<td width="36">1,8</td>
<td width="36">2,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Denmark </strong></td>
<td width="38">7,1</td>
<td width="39">7,1</td>
<td width="49">99,8</td>
<td width="42">4,0</td>
<td width="38">4,4</td>
<td width="52">108,5</td>
<td width="36">3,0</td>
<td width="36">2,7</td>
<td width="49">88,3</td>
<td width="36">1,0</td>
<td width="36">1,7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="38">7,3</td>
<td width="39">6,5</td>
<td width="49">89,7</td>
<td width="42">1,9</td>
<td width="38">2,1</td>
<td width="52">106,5</td>
<td width="36">5,3</td>
<td width="36">4,4</td>
<td width="49">83,5</td>
<td width="36">-3,4</td>
<td width="36">-2,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Finland</strong></td>
<td width="38">3,9</td>
<td width="39">4,2</td>
<td width="49">107,5</td>
<td width="42">2,2</td>
<td width="38">2,3</td>
<td width="52">101,1</td>
<td width="36">1,7</td>
<td width="36">2,0</td>
<td width="49">116,0</td>
<td width="36">0,5</td>
<td width="36">0,3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="38">1,0</td>
<td width="39">1,0</td>
<td width="49">104,7</td>
<td width="42">0,6</td>
<td width="38">0,6</td>
<td width="52">104,9</td>
<td width="36">0,4</td>
<td width="36">0,4</td>
<td width="49">104,3</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="38">0,6</td>
<td width="39">0,5</td>
<td width="49">85,8</td>
<td width="42">0,5</td>
<td width="38">0,4</td>
<td width="52">81,0</td>
<td width="36">0,1</td>
<td width="36">0,1</td>
<td width="49">103,6</td>
<td width="36">0,3</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="38">0,5</td>
<td width="39">0,5</td>
<td width="49">94,0</td>
<td width="42">0,4</td>
<td width="38">0,3</td>
<td width="52">92,5</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="36">0,1</td>
<td width="49">97,7</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Iceland </strong></td>
<td width="38">0,2</td>
<td width="39">0,2</td>
<td width="49">100,3</td>
<td width="42">0,1</td>
<td width="38">0,1</td>
<td width="52">126,4</td>
<td width="36">0,2</td>
<td width="36">0,1</td>
<td width="49">88,2</td>
<td width="36">-0,1</td>
<td width="36">0,0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>Baltic countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="38">68,5</td>
<td width="39">64,8</td>
<td width="49">94,6</td>
<td width="42">34,0</td>
<td width="38">33,2</td>
<td width="52">97,7</td>
<td width="36">34,5</td>
<td width="36">31,6</td>
<td width="49">91,4</td>
<td width="36">-0,6</td>
<td width="36">1,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="39"></td>
<td width="49"></td>
<td width="42"></td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="52"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="49"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
<td width="36"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68"><strong>World, total</strong></td>
<td width="38">508,9</td>
<td width="39">528,1</td>
<td width="49">103,8</td>
<td width="42">278,3</td>
<td width="38">293,3</td>
<td width="52">105,4</td>
<td width="36">230,6</td>
<td width="36">234,8</td>
<td width="49">101,8</td>
<td width="36">47,6</td>
<td width="36">58,5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Table</strong><strong> 11.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Factors of growth/recession in trade between Germany and the Baltic States in 2014-2015.</strong></p>
<table width="510">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" width="61"><strong>Country/group of countries </strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="149"><strong>Turnover Germany – Baltic States, </strong><strong>2015</strong><strong>/2014</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="151"><strong>Export from Germany into the Baltic States, 2015/2014</strong></td>
<td colspan="4" width="148"><strong>Import into Germany from the Baltic States, 2015/2014</strong></td>
<td width="1"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Recession</strong></td>
<td width="38"><strong>Share in growth </strong></td>
<td width="38"><strong>Share in recession </strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Recession </strong></td>
<td width="38"><strong>Share in growth </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Share in recession </strong></td>
<td width="33"><strong>Growth </strong></td>
<td width="40"><strong>Recession</strong></td>
<td width="38"><strong>Share in growth</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38"><strong>Share in recession </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Bln euros</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="76"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="74"><strong>Bln euros</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="78"><strong>%</strong></td>
<td colspan="2" width="73"><strong>Bln euros</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="76"><strong>%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Poland</strong></td>
<td width="33">+2,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+82,3</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="33">+1,1</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+56,6</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33">+1,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+81,2</td>
<td colspan="2" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Russia</strong></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-5,7</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="38">-86,7</td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-2,6</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="40">-95,7</td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-3,1</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-69,5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Sweden</strong></td>
<td width="33">+0,2</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+5,7</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="33">+0,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+15,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,1</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-2,8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Denmark</strong></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="38">-0,2</td>
<td width="33">+0,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+18,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,4</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-7,9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Norway</strong></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,8</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="38">-11,4</td>
<td width="33">+0,1</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+6,7</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,9</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-19,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Finland </strong></td>
<td width="33">+0,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+10,4</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+1,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33">+0,3</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+17,4</td>
<td colspan="2" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Lithuania </strong></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+1,6</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+1,5</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+1,1</td>
<td colspan="2" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Estonia</strong></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,1</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="38">-1,3</td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,1</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="40">-3,3</td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+0,3</td>
<td colspan="2" width="38"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Latvia</strong></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="38">-0,5</td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="40">-1,0</td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-0,1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Iceland </strong></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td width="33">+0,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="38">+1,0</td>
<td width="40"></td>
<td width="33"></td>
<td width="40">-0,0</td>
<td width="38"></td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-0,4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61"><strong>Baltic countries, total</strong></td>
<td width="33">+2,8</td>
<td width="40">-6,6</td>
<td width="38">+100,0</td>
<td width="38">-100,0</td>
<td width="33">+1,9</td>
<td width="40">-2,7</td>
<td width="38">100,0</td>
<td width="40">-100,0</td>
<td width="33">+1,6</td>
<td width="40">-4,5</td>
<td width="38">+100,0</td>
<td colspan="2" width="38">-100,0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note. The Baltic countries are presented in Tables 10 and 11 in descending order of their turnover with Germany in January-March 2015.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Russia accounted for more than 80% of decline of the German-Baltic trade, including more than 90% reduction in German exports and almost 70% reduction in German imports. The extent of the fall was 31.6% of turnover (including 33.9% for exports from Germany and 29.9% for imports into Germany). Noticeable, but not as dramatic, contraction of trade with Germany happened also in Estonia (-14.2% in turnover due to the decrease of exports from Germany by 19.0%) and in Norway (-10.3% in turnover due to 16.5% decline of imports in Germany). Two other countries &#8211; Denmark and Latvia &#8211; showed a moderate reduction in trade with Germany. The other five countries had a positive balance, with the biggest step forward made by Poland (it provided more than 80% of the growth of the German-Baltic turnover, including more than 50% of the growth of German exports and over 80% in increase in German imports). As a result, Poland, that was lagging behind Russia in turnover with Germany by 7.4% in 2012, surpassed Russia two-fold on this indicator in the first quarter of 2015.</p>
<p>The main products that led to a sharp collapse of the German-Russian trade:</p>
<ul>
<li>for exports from Germany &#8211; eight positions from the commodity group &#8220;finished products&#8221; (50.1% decline in the context of three-digit classification), namely: automotive components (13.7%), passenger cars (9.3%), aerial vehicles (6.8%), trucks (4.9%), machines without sectoral specialization (4.0%), office and computing equipment (3.9%), pharmaceutical products (3.8%), machinery for mining and construction (3.6%);</li>
<li>for imports into Germany &#8211; one position from the commodity group &#8220;raw material&#8221;, namely: oil/gas (84.4% decline in the context of three-digit classification); the negative trend was reinforced by reduction of imports of semi-finished products, namely oil products (10.7%), which is Russia&#8217;s second most important import goods, that previously performed the role of a shock absorber.</li>
</ul>
<p>The value of Russia as a trading company for Germany decreased markedly. The share of Russia in the export of goods from Germany declined from 2.6% in 2014 to 1.7% in 2015 (only three years ago, in 2012, it was 3.5%). As a German consumer the Russian Federation moved from the 12th place in 2014 to the 15th place in 2015. Russia’s best result was the 11th place in 2011-2012, and the worst – the 20th place in 1999. Russian automotive components descended from the 10th place in 2014 to the 18th place in 2015; Russia’s passenger cars &#8211; from the 15th to the 17th. If this trend persists, Russia can find itself already in two years in the third ten export partners of Germany, as it will cease to represent any serious business interest for Germany.</p>
<p>The share of Russia in the import of goods to Germany fell from 4.2% in 2014 to 3.1% in 2015 (the highest level of this indicator was recorded in 2012 &#8211; 4.7%). As a German supplier, Russia dropped from the 10th place in 2014 to the 12th place in 2015. In 2011-2013, the country kept the 7th place, in 1999 it was on the 16th place. In 2015, the Russian Federation retained the 1st place for the group &#8220;oil/gas&#8221; (its share in German imports amounted to 29.1%), but in the context of four-digit classification it kept the championship only for oil with a share of 28.2%, whereas for gas it moved to the 2nd place (with a share of 30.0%), losing to Norway (34.2%). Russia&#8217;s role in the import of oil/gas in Germany peaked in 2011 (36.8%); since then it has been steadily weakening, and since 2015 this trend has not been blocked, as before, by the increasing role of Russia in the German imports of oil products (2010 &#8211; 10.0%, 2014 &#8211; 23.3%, 2015 &#8211; 18.9%), and the other Russian products are not comparable with those main products in terms of imports in Germany. In the second ten import partners of Germany Russia will stay longer than in the same weight category for exports from Germany, but the probability of a significant reduction in the influence of Russian business on the German market is very high.</p>
<p>International trade, as well as the nature, abhors a vacuum. Collapsing trade relations with Russia will strengthen Germany&#8217;s orientation to other counterparties. Regarding the Baltic States, this would be beneficial, first of all, for Poland, Sweden and Norway: Poland will strengthen its leadership, Sweden will push Russia to the third place in terms of turnover, Norway will close the gap from Russia in terms of imports into Germany.</p>
<p><strong>List of references</strong></p>
<p>Statistisches Bundesamt. Genesis-Online Datenbank. Statistik 51000. Außenhandel. URL: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[1] Here and elsewhere &#8211; calculated according to the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Statistisches Bundesamt. Genesis-Online Datenbank. Statistik 51000. Außenhandel. URL: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online). Dataareperiodicallyupdated. The Baltic countries are understood as countries that along with Germany are included in the Council of the Baltic Sea States (Denmark, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Russia, Finland, Sweden, Estonia).</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.abfund.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1069</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economy of the Baltic States in the Light of New Global and Regional Challenges</title>
		<link>http://en.abfund.org/?p=1053</link>
		<comments>http://en.abfund.org/?p=1053#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amber Bridge. Journal of Regional Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[№1 (4) 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithuania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.abfund.org/?p=1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikolay Maratovich Mezhevich — Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the School of International Relations, Head of the International Master’s Program “Baltic and Nordic Studies” at the Saint-Petersburg State University, Chief Researcher at the Institute of the Problems of the Regional Economy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg. The Evolution of post-Soviet space suggests [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page" title="Page 25">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(30.000000%, 30.000000%, 30.000000%);">Nikolay Maratovich Mezhevich </span><span style="color: #4c4c4c;">— Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the School of International Relations, Head of the International Master’s Program “Baltic and Nordic Studies” at the Saint-Petersburg State University, Chief Researcher at the Institute of the Problems of the Regional Economy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg.</span></p>
<div class="page" title="Page 15">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span style="font-style: italic; color: #333333;">The Evolution of post-Soviet space suggests the emergence of a set of economic models. The three Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) in the 1980-ies are building a new economic model (a unique to the post-Soviet space). The economy of the Baltic States is a complex system, which is highly dependent not only on economic but also on political realities. The objective of the study is to show the stages of evolution of the Baltic economic model, its main development features and prospects. The author used both economic and historical approaches to scientific analysis. The results of the study indicate that liberal Baltic economic model may persist in the medium term while maintaining previous support from the EU. Only good relations with Russia may help to maintain Baltic economic model. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #cc002b;">Key words: </span><span style="color: #4c4c4c;">Baltic States, Estonia, Russia, foreign economic relations, economic structure, economic model, the political elites. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The natural development of an economic model for the Baltic countries is an integrated process that is determined by political rather that economic reality. A quarter of a century after these countries gained economic independence (which existed long before August 1991), we can put Baltic economic developments into perspective.</p>
<p>Russian and foreign analysts always hit a wall when trying to view the economic development of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from both neo-Keynesian and neoclassical standpoints. Why? Because after 1991, the economy of the Baltics was harshly dictated by political reasons. The basis for the Baltic economic model were separatism and nationalism rather than balance and efficiency.[1]In reality. this European-looking model is not what it seems.</p>
<p>Prior to Perestroyka, the economic situation of the Baltic nations within the Soviet Union used to be as follows: in 1986, the fixed asset value was 5875 rubles for every Soviet citizen. This figure had noticeable disproportion throughout the country: on one hand, it made 8007 rubles in Estonia, 6923 rubles in Latvia, 6111 rubles in Lithuania; on the other hand, there was as low as 5500 rubles per citizen in Belorussia, 4500 rubles in Moldavia, 3823 rubles in Azerbaijan and 2291 rubles in Tajikistan.</p>
<p>The republics found themselves to be divided by a growing salary gap. In 1940, workers and employees’ salaries in different republics saw a maximum dispersion of 10 rubles. Then it reached 21 rubles in 1960, 33 rubles in 1970, and as high as 78 rubles in 1988. The contrasts looked even more striking in agriculture, with the difference between the top and bottom kolkhoz members&#8217; salaries making 74 rubles in 1970 and 159  rubles in 1989.[2]It is worth noting that the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian Soviet Republics were holding the lead.</p>
<p>&#8220;Production reconstruction and enhancement process in the Baltic countries showed a faster rate than elsewhere in the Soviet Union, mainly due to the fact the Latvia and Estonia were reserves of qualified workforce for the whole Soviet state.  Moreover, infrastructure in the Baltic region was almost intact during the war».[3]</p>
<p>The share of Baltic population with over 300 rubles of total income was the biggest in 1990. The national average for the whole USSR equaled 8.8 percent while reaching 19.8 percent in Estonia, 14.5 percent in Latvia and 13.8 percent in Lithuania. The poverty rate in these republics was also among the lowest, people with 75-ruble income making 1 percent of the whole Estonian and Latvian population and 1.2 percent of Lithuanians, whereas it was republics with the highest poverty headcount that developed into the severest autocracies in post-Soviet era.[4]</p>
<p>Since this region was the most efficient from the investment point of view, Moscow sought to allocate new industrial facilities here.  Compared to other regions, it took less time to master production in the Baltics.</p>
<p>The share of new fixed assets in the Baltic republics was higher that the USSR average, with more up-to-date and less obsolete facilities and technology. Agriculture showed a similar picture: kolkhozes and sovkhozes were distributed fertilizers, machinery, forage, imported elite breeding cattle, etc. on more favorable terms.</p>
<p>In the early 1990s, Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn provided much similar models of economic development in the form of regional cost-accounting plans. The Baltic nations, yet Soviet at the time, viewed the future reforms  based on their nostalgic, and sometimes inadequate, ideas and memories of what the so-called ‘first republics’ used to be. The mythology of their past played a key role in their denial of the present life within the USSR. It was as early as 1991 when we used to point out the importance of the Soviet heritage in the later economic development of the countries.[5] Later this idea was multiply referred to and developed in a number of academic papers.[6]L. Grigoriev and his fellow contributors believe that &#8216;the Baltic countries boasted the best starting conditions (compared to other post-Soviet states) for building a market economy, with huge innovational potential was accumulated there. The region was more like a laboratory where improved Soviet economic models were tested. The Baltic republics always enjoyed a privileged status among others, as seen from the investment figures of 1970–1980: the investment volume per capita was the highest.‘</p>
<p>The leaders of the Baltic ‘people’s fronts’ were not experts in market laws and could not estimate the real value of the national resources since they all were previously living in a centralized state-controlled planned economy, where one single center was busy allocating funds as well as distributing the product.</p>
<p>After having seized power, the newly formed elite had to deal with the opposition which was all concentrated around key Soviet industrial facilities. Such factories and plants as Latvian VEF, RAF, Alfa or Estonian Dvigatel, Eesti Kabel, Kreenholm comprised the core and the basis of the opposition. Disrupting these would put an end to opposition. Low competitiveness of these firms was another pretext for de-industrialization. This process would also result in weaker trade union movement and potentially less social packages. However, Estonian and Latvian reformers (and their congenial Russian counterparts) acted in a different way, saying that &#8220;the destruction of what is unsustainable is not an argument against, but in support of the transformation&#8221;.<em><strong>[7]</strong></em></p>
<p>Despite these facts, the biggest companies in the Baltics states were still those of the Soviet heritage as late as in 1997.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Table 1.  The Biggest Latvian Industrial Companies (according to the number of employed)[8]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table width="471">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="163">Company</td>
<td width="188">Industrial Segment</td>
<td width="115">Number of Employees</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol>
<li>Latvijas dzelzceѕls</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Railroad</td>
<td width="115">17 792</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="2">
<li>Latvijas pasts</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Postal service</td>
<td width="115">7493</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="3">
<li>Latvenergo</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Electric power</td>
<td width="115">7411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="4">
<li>Lattelekom</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Telecommunications</td>
<td width="115">5266</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="5">
<li>Tramvaju un trolejbusu parv.</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Public transport</td>
<td width="115">4081</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="6">
<li>Latvijas gaze</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Gas (trade)</td>
<td width="115">2914</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="7">
<li>Tolaram Fibers</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Synthetic fiber production</td>
<td width="115">2870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="8">
<li>Lokomotive</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Railroad locomotive maintenance</td>
<td width="115">2689</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="163">
<ol start="9">
<li>Latvijas finieris</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="188">Wood processing</td>
<td width="115">2687</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Table 2. The Biggest Lithuanian Industrial Companies (according to the number of employed).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table width="474">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="136">Company</td>
<td colspan="2" width="213">Industrial Segment</td>
<td width="116">Number of Employees</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol>
<li>Lietuvos gelezinkeliai</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Railroad</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">16 921</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="2">
<li>Lietuvos energija</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Electric power</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">11 340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="3">
<li>Lietuvos telekomas</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Telecommunications</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">9913</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="4">
<li>Lietuvos pastas</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Postal service</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">8840</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="5">
<li>Ignalinos atomine elektrine</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Nuclear power plant</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">4918</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="6">
<li>Ekranas</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">TV equipment</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">4563</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="7">
<li>Lietuvos dujos</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Gaz (trade)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">3878</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="8">
<li>Mazeikiu nafta</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Oil refining</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">3434</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol start="9">
<li>Vilniaus prekybos mazmena</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Commerce</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">2398</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ol>
<li>Kuro aparatura</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td colspan="2">Pumps and compressors</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">2397</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Table 3. The Biggest Estonain Industrial Companies (according to the number of employed).</p>
<table width="474">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="149">Company</td>
<td colspan="2" width="176">Industrial Segment</td>
<td width="139">Number of Employees</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol>
<li>Eesti Energia</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Electric power</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">7500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="2">
<li>Eesti Raudtee</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Railroad</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">5510</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="3">
<li>Eesti Post</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Post service</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">3423</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="4">
<li>Eesti Telefon</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Telecommunications</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">3272</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="5">
<li>Elcoteq Tallinn</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Electric lamp production</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">2504</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="6">
<li>Estonia Kaevandus</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Oil shale extraction</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">1766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="7">
<li>Eesti Merelaevandus*</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Maritime navigation</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">1716</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="8">
<li>Tarmeko</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Furniture production</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">1486</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol start="9">
<li>Tallinna Trammi-ja Trollibussikondis</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Public transport</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">1333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149">
<ol>
<li>Tallinna Sadam</li>
</ol>
</td>
<td width="173">Stevedoring</td>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">1295</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The privatization of the Soviet heritage was greatly positive for the Baltic economies, encouraging progressive growth all through the most troublesome period of early 1990s.</p>
<p>At that very time, financial and monetary reforms took place in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. A strong and stable national currency safeguards a nation&#8217;s independence and economic stability. In the Baltic nations, deficit-free budget has become the strategic goal one was desperately trying to achieve. This cost the countries a lot, with serious budget limitations introduced especially affecting the social sphere. Borrowing was not even taken to account as a possible solution, until in recent years. By this time, however, the national financial systems have de jure seized to exist. One fact is worth noting in relation to this circumstances: when visiting Vilnius on Jan 14, 2015, Donald Tusk, Chairman of the European Council (Poland’s ex-Prime Minister) called euro adoption in Latvia ‘a historic moment’[9]. No one was curious then, though,  why Mr. Tusk had done his best in his country for this ‘historic moment’ to be avoided there.</p>
<p>The fact is that joining the European Union had a relatively narrow effect on Baltic nations, since these countries already had the right to sell 60- to 65 percent of its commodities on a duty-free basis while being associated partners of the EU. Moreover, since 2001 industrial commodity trade there has been totally duty-free.[10]</p>
<p>Liberalism can be called the second cornerstone of the Estonian economic policy, meaning renunciation of protectionism, free and toll-free trade with neighbors (alcohol, tobacco and some other goods excluded), and relatively low taxes (business tax rate is 26%). This kind of approach encourages saturation of inner market and comparatively low prices, as well as foreign investment and cargo flow growth, which are per capita higher than in Russia. However, this approach creates certain obstacles. Taking into account the protectionist and discriminating fee policy currently maintained by other countries, the inner market stays vulnerable as Estonian-made goods are not competitive enough. This leads to the domination of imported goods, making it harder for its own producers to develop, especially in agriculture.</p>
<p>The third important point is fast, successful reforms in agrarian and  municipal sphere, as well as housing and utilities.</p>
<p>The economic recession during the transformation crisis was deep in the Baltic nations: the economy fell –35% in Estonia, –49% in Lithuania and –52% in Latvia. IEstonia was the first to cope with its consequences in 2001 and reach the pre-crisis level of 1989. The result was its GDP growing 158 percent of this base. Economic progress of Latvia and Lithuania was not that impressive: 115 and 111% respectively.[11]</p>
<p>The comprehension of the complicated development processes and the acknowledgement of initial mistakes in reforming become (though still not frequently) the subject for discussions among the economists in the Baltic counries.[12]Before 2008, such discussions were yet not acceptable in the ‘Baltic tiger’ countries that showed 7 to 9 percent growth each year. There was not much talk of the 12 to 19 percent decrease at the time. Instead, the fact that the country survived the 2008-2009 crisis was treated as a true success story.[13]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Table 4. GDP Growth, %.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="101"></td>
<td width="89">2009</td>
<td width="96">2010</td>
<td width="96">2011</td>
<td width="96">2012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="101">Estonia[14]</td>
<td width="89">- 14,1</td>
<td width="96">3,3</td>
<td width="96">8,3</td>
<td width="96">3,2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="101">Latvia[15]</td>
<td width="89">- 17,7</td>
<td width="96">- 0,9</td>
<td width="96">5,5</td>
<td width="96">5,6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="101">Lithuania[16]</td>
<td width="89">-14,5</td>
<td width="96">1,5</td>
<td width="96">5,9</td>
<td width="96">3,6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Baltic countries’ dependency on Russian oil and gas and energy supply was a serious challenge for Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as the fact that the three were included in the Soviet-era cargo transportation system in which cargo flows from their sea ports were eastbound. The result was that the Baltic region obtained a predominant status of a  transitional, by-pass cargo hub. Russia is Latvia&#8217;s third largest trade partner, with 10 percent of its trade operations, and Estonia’s fourth biggest trade partner (with 8.4%). Speaking of Lithuania, Russia is number one partner for the country, holding 25% of all trade volume, which is three times higher than with Lithuania’s second biggest partner, Germany (8.4%).[17]However, a shrinking trade volume with Russia has also tended to cause macroeconomic decrease. Unlike in 2013, in 2014 Estonia was the third among the Baltic states as far as GDP growth is concerned. Annual GDP growth was 2.4% in Latvia, 2,9% in Lithuania and 1,8% in Estonia[18]. These figures may look optimistic in present-day Europe, but they will never allow, as people used to say in the USSR, ‘to catch up and overtake’ any other EU country – except for Greece, perhaps.</p>
<p>Expert say that the total exports from the Baltic countries to Russia may fall 18 to 25 percent in 2015, resulting in $780 million deficit for Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, however, their growth is expected to lose 1.3 to 1.7 percent less that last year. In terms of money, the countries are about to lose $1.58 billion[19]. Isthissum critical? Let’s see: the estimated budget revenue in 2015 is about 7.25 billion euros for Latvia[20], same for Estonia and a little more for Lithuania. Apparently, 250 million euros for each country is big money.</p>
<p>To summarize the above, the economic model that was built in the Baltic countries is economically viable, at least on the mid-term horizon. IF the outer conditions are relatively stable, one can predict a 1.5 to 2.0 GDP growth. In case military and infrastructural expenditures grow, the real income growth will be close to zero. Stagnation of exports and decrease in transit will contribute to destabilization of the economies in the region.</p>
<p>However, the real problem lies elsewhere. The fact that real historical problems of the past are constantly emphasized helps to preserve anti-Russian sentiments on the level of the elite, that tends to capitalize, politically and even financially while encouraging and practicing Russophobic rhetoric. The window of opportunities for co-operation with Russia is constantly shrinking. The Baltic elites preferred to stay away from consistent solution-seeking process and take part in political, rather than economic, discussions. One of the reasons for this (which has never mentioned before, nor will be in the foreseeable future) is that no elite in the Baltics is free to choose its political agenda. In this context, the Baltic countries are quite similar to Belarus rather than Poland or Russia.</p>
<p>There is an opinion that is often heard in the economist community, that European economic development has been derailed. In the past, we knew that politics and economy interact dialectically; nowadays, economy simply becomes a tool for policy to achieve its goals. The golden age of the European economy that lasted from the 1950s till about 2007, has come to an end. European growth will no longer be 3-5 percent, and this situation will take place until the whole political and economic paradigm is changed.</p>
<p>The brilliant success of European integration is obvious. Europeanist ideas that resurrected after WWII have proved to be robust and viable. However, new challenges of 2008-2015 put an end to the  model of development which our European home had. This is true for the Baltic nations which are fully dependent on both European and their own model of development.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[1] <em>Шадрин А.</em> Экономический фактор политики сепаратизма в республиках Советской Прибалтики // КМЦ Прикладной этнографии Института этнологии и антропологии РАН Москва, 1996.</p>
<p>[2] Агафонов Н.Т, Литовка О.П, Исляев Р.А. Государственная стратегия регионального развития России: смена парадигмы территориальной организации общества СПб 1998 с.39</p>
<p>[3]Misiunas R. Taagepera R. The Baltic States: Year of dependence 1940-1980 L. 1983 р.104</p>
<p>[4] <strong>Гареева Н. Э.,  Шкель С. Н. Теория модернизации и социально-экономические факторы демократизации в контексте политических трансформаций на постсоветском пространстве</strong><strong><br />
</strong><a href="http://gisap.eu/ru/teoriya-modernizatsii-i-sotsialno-ekonomicheskie-faktory-demokratizatsii-v-kontekste-politicheskikh">http://gisap.eu/ru/teoriya-modernizatsii-i-sotsialno-ekonomicheskie-faktory-demokratizatsii-v-kontekste-politicheskikh</a></p>
<p>[5] Межевич Н.М. Геополитическое положение Эстонской ССР: мифы и реальность // Политическая география и современность. Региональные и прикладные аспекты: Л.ЛГУ, 1991</p>
<p>[6] Самонис В. Трансформация литовской экономики: от Москвы к Вильнюсу и от плана</p>
<p>к рынку. Варшава: CASE, 1995; Григорьев, Л.М. Конкуренция и сотрудничество: экономические перспективы Восточной Балтики Москва 2005.</p>
<p>[7] Путь в Европу // Под. общ. ред. И. М. Клямкина и Л. Ф. Шевцовой. М.: Новое издательство. 2008. С. 39.</p>
<p>[8] Берзиньш Ингус Они дают нам работу[8] http://www.baltic-course.com/archive/rus/13/reyting.htm Дата обращения 11.03.2015</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>[9] Руководство ЕС приветствовало вступление Литвы в еврозону <a href="http://dw.de/p/1EKhU">http://dw.de/p/1EKhU</a></p>
<p>15.01.2015</p>
<p>[10] Бройсс Ф. Макроэкономические последствия расширения ЕС для его старых и новых членов // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2003. № 5. С. 29.</p>
<p>[11] Актуальные вопросы мировой экономики: 2010 – 2012. Под общей редакцией Григорьева Л.М., Иващенко А.С. Балтийский форум 2012 с.53</p>
<p>[12]Grigas A., Kasekamp A., Maslauskaite K., Zorgenfreija L., “The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow” // Studies &amp; Reports No 98, Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute, July 2013.</p>
<p>[13]Dudzińska Kinga  The Baltic States’ Success Story in Combating the Economic Crisis: Consequences for Regional Cooperation within the EU and with Russia // POLICY PAPER</p>
<p>No. 6 (54), POLSKI INSTYTUT SPRAW MIEDZYNARODOWYCH March 2013</p>
<p>[14] RAA012: SISEMAJANDUSE KOGUPRODUKT JA KOGURAHVATULU (KVARTALID) // Eesti Statistika andmebaas. URL: <a href="http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/dialog/varval.asp?ma=RAA012&amp;ti=SISEMAJANDUSE+KOGUPRODUKT+JA+KOGURAHVATULU+%28KVARTALID%29&amp;path=../database/Majandus/15Rahvamajanduse_arvepidamine/06Sisemajanduse_koguprodukt_%28SKP%29/02Pehilised_rahvamajanduse_arvepidamise_naitajad/&amp;search=SISEMAJANDUSE+KOGUPRODUKT+JA+KOGURAHVATULU&amp;lang=2">http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/dialog/varval.asp?ma=RAA012&amp;ti=SISEMAJANDUSE+KOGUPRODUKT+JA+KOGURAHVATULU+%28KVARTALID%29&amp;path=../database/Majandus/15Rahvamajanduse_arvepidamine/06Sisemajanduse_koguprodukt_%28SKP%29/02Pehilised_rahvamajanduse_arvepidamise_naitajad/&amp;search=SISEMAJANDUSE+KOGUPRODUKT+JA+KOGURAHVATULU&amp;lang=2</a>. Дата обновления: 11.03.2013.</p>
<p>[15]Eurostat <a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&amp;plugin=1&amp;language=en&amp;pcode=tec00115">http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&amp;plugin=1&amp;language=en&amp;pcode=tec00115</a></p>
<p>[16] Statistical Yearbook of Lithuania, 2012 <a href="http://web.stat.gov.lt/uploads/metrastis/1_LSM_2012.pdf">http://web.stat.gov.lt/uploads/metrastis/1_LSM_2012.pdf</a></p>
<p>[17] Зельценберг В. Легче застрелиться: страны Балтии подсчитывают убытки от девальвации рубля <a href="http://bb.lv/rinki-i-kompanii/item/9160776-legche-zastrelitsya-strany-baltii-podschityvayut-ubytki-ot-devalvatsii-rublya">http://bb.lv/rinki-i-kompanii/item/9160776-legche-zastrelitsya-strany-baltii-podschityvayut-ubytki-ot-devalvatsii-rublya</a>  22.12.2014</p>
<p>[18] По росту ВВП Эстония заметно отстает от остальных стран Балтии <a href="http://rup.ee/rus/novosti/ekonomika-i-biznes/po-rostu-vvp-estoniia-zametno-otstaet-ot-ostalnykh-stran-baltii">http://rup.ee/rus/novosti/ekonomika-i-biznes/po-rostu-vvp-estoniia-zametno-otstaet-ot-ostalnykh-stran-baltii</a> 27.03.2015</p>
<p>[19] Как российский кризис скажется на экономиках стран Балтии <a href="http://rup.ee/rus/novosti/mirovaia-ekonomika/kak-rossiiskii-krizis-skazhetsia-na-ekonomikakh-stran-baltii">http://rup.ee/rus/novosti/mirovaia-ekonomika/kak-rossiiskii-krizis-skazhetsia-na-ekonomikakh-stran-baltii</a> 25.03.2015</p>
<p>[20] Доходы госбюджета Латвии в 2015 году составят 7,25 млрд. евро <a href="http://www.baltic-course.com/rus/finansi/?doc=99880">http://www.baltic-course.com/rus/finansi/?doc=99880</a> БК, Рига, 09.12.2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.abfund.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1053</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
